Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
'99 - '06 GM Truck Modifications
Engine & Performance
Gear ratio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="INW-Iron-Steel" data-source="post: 28582" data-attributes="member: 11733"><p>Turbo. That's it. The 5.3 and 6.0 have the same stroke length. That is why the 5.3 works OK in a heavy vehicle and the 4.8 is pretty much worthless for doing real work (4.8 van with a trailer is downright pathetic).</p><p></p><p>In my opinion, you over-cammed the 4.8 for your application. That 212/218 cam shifts the torque curve on a 5.3; the torque loss down low will be worse on the 4.8. If you want to keep that cam and not go forced induction, put a converter in it so you can get into the powerband quicker (2500RPM and up). This comes with drawbacks mentioned above. 4.56s with 33s are a bit much in something you intend to drive regularly. 285/70/17s are 32.7" and I don't consider that a particularly large tire. </p><p></p><p>If it were me, I'd put a different cam in it. Cheaper and easier than a converter or gears. Take a look at Cam Motion. Their stage 2 cams are much tamer, especially for the 4.8 (202/206 @ .050). The Cam Motion 5.3 stage 1 (200/204) Summit Torkinator (200/205) and BTR Torque (202/202) would be good alternatives that will make low speed torque. With that last one, single pattern cams have a history of being able to make slightly better low speed torque. FWIW, my 4.8 won't spin the 285/60/18s with a limited slip... unless the road is wet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="INW-Iron-Steel, post: 28582, member: 11733"] Turbo. That's it. The 5.3 and 6.0 have the same stroke length. That is why the 5.3 works OK in a heavy vehicle and the 4.8 is pretty much worthless for doing real work (4.8 van with a trailer is downright pathetic). In my opinion, you over-cammed the 4.8 for your application. That 212/218 cam shifts the torque curve on a 5.3; the torque loss down low will be worse on the 4.8. If you want to keep that cam and not go forced induction, put a converter in it so you can get into the powerband quicker (2500RPM and up). This comes with drawbacks mentioned above. 4.56s with 33s are a bit much in something you intend to drive regularly. 285/70/17s are 32.7" and I don't consider that a particularly large tire. If it were me, I'd put a different cam in it. Cheaper and easier than a converter or gears. Take a look at Cam Motion. Their stage 2 cams are much tamer, especially for the 4.8 (202/206 @ .050). The Cam Motion 5.3 stage 1 (200/204) Summit Torkinator (200/205) and BTR Torque (202/202) would be good alternatives that will make low speed torque. With that last one, single pattern cams have a history of being able to make slightly better low speed torque. FWIW, my 4.8 won't spin the 285/60/18s with a limited slip... unless the road is wet. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Water intrusion in rear cargo area?
Latest: FW_Z71Burb
5 minutes ago
Interior
Rebuilding 4l60e
Latest: INW-Iron-Steel
Today at 12:28 PM
Transmission & Transfer Case
4silverado's 2004 Silverado
Latest: 4silverado
Yesterday at 3:09 PM
Under Construction
2001 Tahoe high presure on low side of A/C
Latest: CPB
Yesterday at 12:45 PM
Tech Discussion
Stutaeng's 1999 Silverado
Latest: stutaeng
Thursday at 9:26 PM
Under Construction
Members online
stutaeng
FW_Z71Burb
Forums
'99 - '06 GM Truck Modifications
Engine & Performance
Gear ratio
Top