Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
'99 - '06 GM Truck Modifications
Engine & Performance
Hot start issue with 2000 Silverado 1500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DarkNinjaSG" data-source="post: 23920" data-attributes="member: 12584"><p>Sounds good. The connector still feels like it’s sealing to the sensor good. Think it’s still good to reuse the old connector in that case?</p><p></p><p>Heres what I did this morning:</p><p></p><p>I started it up this morning with the sensor unplugged and let it sit for like 10 minutes and the ltft never went negative. I then plugged the sensor back in and let it idle for a while again and the ltft on both banks went negative again. With the engine fully warmed up and the sensor unplugged the engine doesn't dip to 300 rpm, but if I plug the sensor back in it does. I disconnected the fuel pressure regulator vacuum line and didn't see any fuel coming out of it (with sensor plugged in). This caused the ltft to get closer to zero cause of the vacuum leak , but when I blocked off the vacuum line it still didn't go as negative as normal. The idle vibration was worse when idling with the sensor unplugged. I'll post some videos of my ultra gauge readings when it's idling with and without the sensor plugged in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DarkNinjaSG, post: 23920, member: 12584"] Sounds good. The connector still feels like it’s sealing to the sensor good. Think it’s still good to reuse the old connector in that case? Heres what I did this morning: I started it up this morning with the sensor unplugged and let it sit for like 10 minutes and the ltft never went negative. I then plugged the sensor back in and let it idle for a while again and the ltft on both banks went negative again. With the engine fully warmed up and the sensor unplugged the engine doesn't dip to 300 rpm, but if I plug the sensor back in it does. I disconnected the fuel pressure regulator vacuum line and didn't see any fuel coming out of it (with sensor plugged in). This caused the ltft to get closer to zero cause of the vacuum leak , but when I blocked off the vacuum line it still didn't go as negative as normal. The idle vibration was worse when idling with the sensor unplugged. I'll post some videos of my ultra gauge readings when it's idling with and without the sensor plugged in. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Rust free state options
Latest: FW_Z71Burb
Today at 1:40 PM
Ebay / Craigslist Finds
GMT800 diagnostic and control app
Latest: AuroraGirl
Yesterday at 5:31 PM
Tech Discussion
Suburban rear window
Latest: ORVietVet
Wednesday at 9:35 PM
Exterior
Manual seat to Electic
Latest: AuroraGirl
Wednesday at 7:38 PM
Interior
M
Gear ratio
Latest: Marky Dissod
Wednesday at 12:00 PM
Engine & Performance
Members online
stutaeng
Forums
'99 - '06 GM Truck Modifications
Engine & Performance
Hot start issue with 2000 Silverado 1500
Top