Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
GMT800.com
Introduction
Lesson learned - GMT900 Regret, GMT800 Reset
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AuroraGirl" data-source="post: 25700" data-attributes="member: 9417"><p>the 180 degree door opening for an extended cab is kinda cool</p><p></p><p>I have literally nothing else to say of the gmt900 that is to its benefit. it was peak bailout GM, they spent a LOT of money engineering them to be econoboxes that allowed them to extract higher margins from buyers because while it shared a lot of frame/suspension engineering , everything else on it was cheaper for GM, so they could sell it for the same amount and make more money than already high margins trucks were becoming. I see gmt800 as the last "truck is truck" and gmt900 as "truck is accessory"</p><p></p><p>They also seem to be rusting worse than any gmt800 on the body, probably cheap steel or cheapened paints/coatings. </p><p>PRe-bailout GM Rick Wagoner (who had no hand in designing the gmt800, thankfully) was putting the companys future on the gmt900, i actually read that in a 200x state of the company pdf i found online. the company was bloated to no end and was trying to cheapen things for that higher margin. the fact they werent profitable goes to many reasons but gmt900 wasnt going to change that on its own</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AuroraGirl, post: 25700, member: 9417"] the 180 degree door opening for an extended cab is kinda cool I have literally nothing else to say of the gmt900 that is to its benefit. it was peak bailout GM, they spent a LOT of money engineering them to be econoboxes that allowed them to extract higher margins from buyers because while it shared a lot of frame/suspension engineering , everything else on it was cheaper for GM, so they could sell it for the same amount and make more money than already high margins trucks were becoming. I see gmt800 as the last "truck is truck" and gmt900 as "truck is accessory" They also seem to be rusting worse than any gmt800 on the body, probably cheap steel or cheapened paints/coatings. PRe-bailout GM Rick Wagoner (who had no hand in designing the gmt800, thankfully) was putting the companys future on the gmt900, i actually read that in a 200x state of the company pdf i found online. the company was bloated to no end and was trying to cheapen things for that higher margin. the fact they werent profitable goes to many reasons but gmt900 wasnt going to change that on its own [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Y
GMT800 diagnostic and control app
Latest: YukonDenali03
Today at 6:41 PM
Tech Discussion
Rust free state options
Latest: FW_Z71Burb
Today at 1:40 PM
Ebay / Craigslist Finds
Suburban rear window
Latest: ORVietVet
Wednesday at 9:35 PM
Exterior
Manual seat to Electic
Latest: AuroraGirl
Wednesday at 7:38 PM
Interior
M
Gear ratio
Latest: Marky Dissod
Wednesday at 12:00 PM
Engine & Performance
Members online
Marky Dissod
Hammer54
Forums
GMT800.com
Introduction
Lesson learned - GMT900 Regret, GMT800 Reset
Top