Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
GMT800.com
Introduction
Lesson learned - GMT900 Regret, GMT800 Reset
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AuroraGirl" data-source="post: 25700" data-attributes="member: 9417"><p>the 180 degree door opening for an extended cab is kinda cool</p><p></p><p>I have literally nothing else to say of the gmt900 that is to its benefit. it was peak bailout GM, they spent a LOT of money engineering them to be econoboxes that allowed them to extract higher margins from buyers because while it shared a lot of frame/suspension engineering , everything else on it was cheaper for GM, so they could sell it for the same amount and make more money than already high margins trucks were becoming. I see gmt800 as the last "truck is truck" and gmt900 as "truck is accessory"</p><p></p><p>They also seem to be rusting worse than any gmt800 on the body, probably cheap steel or cheapened paints/coatings. </p><p>PRe-bailout GM Rick Wagoner (who had no hand in designing the gmt800, thankfully) was putting the companys future on the gmt900, i actually read that in a 200x state of the company pdf i found online. the company was bloated to no end and was trying to cheapen things for that higher margin. the fact they werent profitable goes to many reasons but gmt900 wasnt going to change that on its own</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AuroraGirl, post: 25700, member: 9417"] the 180 degree door opening for an extended cab is kinda cool I have literally nothing else to say of the gmt900 that is to its benefit. it was peak bailout GM, they spent a LOT of money engineering them to be econoboxes that allowed them to extract higher margins from buyers because while it shared a lot of frame/suspension engineering , everything else on it was cheaper for GM, so they could sell it for the same amount and make more money than already high margins trucks were becoming. I see gmt800 as the last "truck is truck" and gmt900 as "truck is accessory" They also seem to be rusting worse than any gmt800 on the body, probably cheap steel or cheapened paints/coatings. PRe-bailout GM Rick Wagoner (who had no hand in designing the gmt800, thankfully) was putting the companys future on the gmt900, i actually read that in a 200x state of the company pdf i found online. the company was bloated to no end and was trying to cheapen things for that higher margin. the fact they werent profitable goes to many reasons but gmt900 wasnt going to change that on its own [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
Water intrusion in rear cargo area?
Latest: stutaeng
Today at 6:03 PM
Interior
Rebuilding 4l60e
Latest: INW-Iron-Steel
Today at 12:28 PM
Transmission & Transfer Case
4silverado's 2004 Silverado
Latest: 4silverado
Yesterday at 3:09 PM
Under Construction
2001 Tahoe high presure on low side of A/C
Latest: CPB
Yesterday at 12:45 PM
Tech Discussion
Stutaeng's 1999 Silverado
Latest: stutaeng
Thursday at 9:26 PM
Under Construction
Staff online
4silverado
Moderator
Members online
4silverado
99Sierra2500
Forums
GMT800.com
Introduction
Lesson learned - GMT900 Regret, GMT800 Reset
Top